Video quality measurement and engineering

CoreVQ

Measure video quality, compare encodes, and diagnose streaming performance. Use the local Suite, commission engineering Services, or plan a future SDK integration.

Discuss a project or integrationExplore Suite
3 offeringsSuite, Services, SDK
3 analysesPerceptual, full-reference, stream
1 engineConsistent measurement foundation

CoreVQ offerings

From direct analysis to product integration

Choose local analysis, a paid engineering engagement, or an integration assessment for your product. Start with the outcome you need.

Evaluation release pending

CoreVQ Suite

CoreVQ Studio and the bundled corevq command line provide local interactive analysis, automation, and structured evidence.

Explore Suite →

Paid engineering engagement

CoreVQ Services

Commission CoreVQ customization, workflow or product integration, or in-house OTT video-quality analysis under defined deliverables and acceptance criteria.

Explore Services →

Planned integration product

CoreVQ SDK

A planned native SDK for embedding quality analysis in media products, automated tests, and OEM systems. Evaluation and licensing begin after a suitable package is qualified.

Explore SDK integration →

Engineering outcomes

Use quality evidence where decisions are made

CoreVQ supports direct investigation today and a clear path toward customer-specific or embedded deployment.

Versioned human-opinion verification

Perceptual score evidence

1,310held-out videos scored

KoNViD-1k720 videos
0.6633SROCC
Microsoft Video Call MOS590 videos
0.8160SROCC
Combined1,310 videos
0.7301SROCC

SROCC measures rank agreement with human opinion. These results support relative quality comparison on the evaluated test partitions; the score does not predict numeric MOS.

Scope, result states, sources, and hashes

Inspectable technology

Technology behind CoreVQ

One native engine connects video measurements, score composition, and execution evidence across Studio and the command line.

Measurement
Native metric values, normalized quality, confidence, and score contribution.
Execution
Analyzed ranges, frame coverage, completion state, warnings, and partial results.
Consistency
Studio and the bundled CLI use the same CoreVQEngine implementation.
Retention
CSV and JSON preserve results and provenance for review and automation.

CoreVQ's scoring, workflow, and evidence layers build on established metrics and third-party components. The published technology material explains those boundaries and integration paths.