Four starting points
Choose a goal. Expand a workflow when you need the detail.
01 Encoding & OTT
Optimize encoding and bitrate
Compare codecs, presets, and bitrate ladders against quality, compute, and delivery constraints.
Outcome A quality–bitrate operating point backed by measured trade-offs.
Workflow details: Optimize encoding and bitrate
Bring Representative source clips, candidate encodes, quality floors, and compute or delivery limits.
Measure Perceptual score, VMAF, PSNR, SSIM, frame coverage, and separately recorded bitrate and compute cost.
01 Define the policy Set quality floors, scale limits, content fixtures, and the encoder search space.
02 Generate candidates Vary codec, resolution, rate control, preset, GOP, frame rate, and bitrate ladder.
03 Measure evidence Run Perceptual Analysis and Full-Reference Analysis with coverage and provenance.
04 Rank and prune Reject failed constraints and remove candidates dominated on quality, cost, or scale.
05 / Decision Converged? Confirm that the winner is stable, sufficiently explored, and inside every limit.
↻ If the result is not stable or misses a limit, refine the candidates and repeat.
Deliverable Recommended codec, preset, and bitrate ladder with evidence and operating limits.
A Services or customer workflow controls encoding and candidate selection.
Reference comparison → OTT analysis services →
Outcome Retained evidence for detecting and investigating stream failures.
Workflow details: Monitor stream quality
Bring Supported stream URLs, sampling intervals, expected properties, and operational thresholds.
Measure TTFF, available startup components, decoded-frame jitter and gaps, source properties, plus a separate perceptual analysis.
01 Schedule endpoints Select live or test URLs, regions, cadence, and expected stream properties.
02 Probe delivery Measure startup time, decoded-frame cadence, failures, and decoded media properties.
03 Sample content Decode representative frames while preserving timing, coverage, and warnings.
04 Measure quality Run perceptual analysis separately from network-dependent evidence.
05 / Continuous Store, alert, repeat Retain the result, alert when declared limits are missed, and schedule the next check.
↻ At the next scheduled interval, sample again and retain both successful and failed checks.
Deliverable Timestamped measurements and failure evidence for a customer-managed alerting and investigation workflow.
Scheduling, storage, dashboards, and alerts require a custom workflow.
Stream measurements → Workflow integration →
Outcome The lowest stable bitrate that meets the declared quality target.
Workflow details: Preserve quality at a lower bitrate
Bring A high-quality camera reference, representative scenes and motion, and candidate compression settings.
Measure VMAF, PSNR, SSIM, perceptual quality, coverage, bitrate, and separately measured compute demand.
01 Establish the source ceiling Capture representative camera output at its highest practical quality and retain it as the reference.
02 Generate encodes Vary codec, bitrate, resolution, rate control, preset, GOP, and other compression settings.
03 Compare with the source Run Full-Reference Analysis and Perceptual Analysis to quantify preserved quality and visible loss.
04 Find the efficiency knee Rank quality gain against bitrate and compute, then remove settings with diminishing returns.
05 / Decision Optimal operating point? Select the lowest stable bitrate that meets the target and stays close to the camera-quality ceiling.
↻ If quality or stability falls short, refine the encoded candidates and compare again.
Deliverable Recommended codec, compression settings, and bitrate relative to the camera’s source-quality ceiling.
Encoder control and the search policy belong to the customer workflow or Services engagement.
Full-reference workflow → Optimization services →
04 Camera qualification
Compare cameras and firmware
Compare devices, lenses, firmware, and profiles under repeatable lighting, scene, and motion conditions.
Outcome A comparison record for selection, qualification, and regression review.
Workflow details: Compare cameras and firmware
Bring A controlled test plan, representative captures, and recorded device, lens, firmware, and profile settings.
Measure Perceptual quality, metric evidence, confidence, and coverage; full-reference metrics where an aligned reference exists.
01 Define the test plan Choose devices, scenes, lighting, motion, resolutions, and acceptance criteria.
02 Capture consistently Use controlled fixtures and retain every device, lens, firmware, and profile setting.
03 Analyze evidence Measure perceptual quality and Full-Reference evidence when an aligned reference exists.
04 Compare results Assess quality, consistency, coverage, warnings, and regressions across conditions.
05 / Output Qualify and report Publish ranked findings with configuration, provenance, and operating limits.
↻ Repeat the same test plan after firmware, configuration, or hardware changes.
Deliverable Ranked findings with configuration, provenance, repeatability evidence, and stated operating limits.
Acceptance criteria and the final qualification decision remain with the customer.
Perceptual measurements → Score evidence →
From measurement to implementation
Choose how to put it to work Use Suite for direct analysis, Services for a defined engineering result, or assess the planned SDK for future embedding.
01 / Local analysis Release pending
CoreVQ Suite Run Studio and the bundled CLI locally to investigate media and compare results.
Workflows and availability →
02 / Custom workflow Engineering engagement
CoreVQ Services Commission customization, workflow integration, or an in-house video-quality study with agreed deliverables.
Explore engineering services →
03 / Product integration Planned product
CoreVQ SDK Plan future native embedding under a qualified API, deployment contract, and separate SDK agreement.
Review planned integration →
CoreVQ provides measurements and evidence. Encoder control, optimization policy, orchestration, and final operating decisions are part of the customer solution or a Services engagement. The SDK is planned and is not included in Suite 1.0.