CoreVQ solutions

Choose your video quality workflow

Start with the decision you need to make. Explore the measurements, workflow, and evidence that support it.

Four starting points

Choose a goal. Expand a workflow when you need the detail.

01 Encoding & OTT

Optimize encoding and bitrate

Compare codecs, presets, and bitrate ladders against quality, compute, and delivery constraints.

OutcomeA quality–bitrate operating point backed by measured trade-offs.

Workflow details: Optimize encoding and bitrate
Bring
Representative source clips, candidate encodes, quality floors, and compute or delivery limits.
Measure
Perceptual score, VMAF, PSNR, SSIM, frame coverage, and separately recorded bitrate and compute cost.
  1. 01

    Define the policy

    Set quality floors, scale limits, content fixtures, and the encoder search space.

  2. 02

    Generate candidates

    Vary codec, resolution, rate control, preset, GOP, frame rate, and bitrate ladder.

  3. 03

    Measure evidence

    Run Perceptual Analysis and Full-Reference Analysis with coverage and provenance.

  4. 04

    Rank and prune

    Reject failed constraints and remove candidates dominated on quality, cost, or scale.

  5. 05 / Decision

    Converged?

    Confirm that the winner is stable, sufficiently explored, and inside every limit.

If the result is not stable or misses a limit, refine the candidates and repeat.

Deliverable

Recommended codec, preset, and bitrate ladder with evidence and operating limits.

A Services or customer workflow controls encoding and candidate selection.

02 Delivery & operations

Monitor stream quality

Check startup, decoded-frame cadence, and content quality against the operating limits you define.

OutcomeRetained evidence for detecting and investigating stream failures.

Workflow details: Monitor stream quality
Bring
Supported stream URLs, sampling intervals, expected properties, and operational thresholds.
Measure
TTFF, available startup components, decoded-frame jitter and gaps, source properties, plus a separate perceptual analysis.
  1. 01

    Schedule endpoints

    Select live or test URLs, regions, cadence, and expected stream properties.

  2. 02

    Probe delivery

    Measure startup time, decoded-frame cadence, failures, and decoded media properties.

  3. 03

    Sample content

    Decode representative frames while preserving timing, coverage, and warnings.

  4. 04

    Measure quality

    Run perceptual analysis separately from network-dependent evidence.

  5. 05 / Continuous

    Store, alert, repeat

    Retain the result, alert when declared limits are missed, and schedule the next check.

At the next scheduled interval, sample again and retain both successful and failed checks.

Deliverable

Timestamped measurements and failure evidence for a customer-managed alerting and investigation workflow.

Scheduling, storage, dashboards, and alerts require a custom workflow.

03 Camera encoding

Preserve quality at a lower bitrate

Use the camera’s best practical source as a reference, then compare compressed candidates.

OutcomeThe lowest stable bitrate that meets the declared quality target.

Workflow details: Preserve quality at a lower bitrate
Bring
A high-quality camera reference, representative scenes and motion, and candidate compression settings.
Measure
VMAF, PSNR, SSIM, perceptual quality, coverage, bitrate, and separately measured compute demand.
  1. 01

    Establish the source ceiling

    Capture representative camera output at its highest practical quality and retain it as the reference.

  2. 02

    Generate encodes

    Vary codec, bitrate, resolution, rate control, preset, GOP, and other compression settings.

  3. 03

    Compare with the source

    Run Full-Reference Analysis and Perceptual Analysis to quantify preserved quality and visible loss.

  4. 04

    Find the efficiency knee

    Rank quality gain against bitrate and compute, then remove settings with diminishing returns.

  5. 05 / Decision

    Optimal operating point?

    Select the lowest stable bitrate that meets the target and stays close to the camera-quality ceiling.

If quality or stability falls short, refine the encoded candidates and compare again.

Deliverable

Recommended codec, compression settings, and bitrate relative to the camera’s source-quality ceiling.

Encoder control and the search policy belong to the customer workflow or Services engagement.

04 Camera qualification

Compare cameras and firmware

Compare devices, lenses, firmware, and profiles under repeatable lighting, scene, and motion conditions.

OutcomeA comparison record for selection, qualification, and regression review.

Workflow details: Compare cameras and firmware
Bring
A controlled test plan, representative captures, and recorded device, lens, firmware, and profile settings.
Measure
Perceptual quality, metric evidence, confidence, and coverage; full-reference metrics where an aligned reference exists.
  1. 01

    Define the test plan

    Choose devices, scenes, lighting, motion, resolutions, and acceptance criteria.

  2. 02

    Capture consistently

    Use controlled fixtures and retain every device, lens, firmware, and profile setting.

  3. 03

    Analyze evidence

    Measure perceptual quality and Full-Reference evidence when an aligned reference exists.

  4. 04

    Compare results

    Assess quality, consistency, coverage, warnings, and regressions across conditions.

  5. 05 / Output

    Qualify and report

    Publish ranked findings with configuration, provenance, and operating limits.

Repeat the same test plan after firmware, configuration, or hardware changes.

Deliverable

Ranked findings with configuration, provenance, repeatability evidence, and stated operating limits.

Acceptance criteria and the final qualification decision remain with the customer.

From measurement to implementation

Choose how to put it to work

Use Suite for direct analysis, Services for a defined engineering result, or assess the planned SDK for future embedding.

01 / Local analysisRelease pending

CoreVQ Suite

Run Studio and the bundled CLI locally to investigate media and compare results.

Workflows and availability
02 / Custom workflowEngineering engagement

CoreVQ Services

Commission customization, workflow integration, or an in-house video-quality study with agreed deliverables.

Explore engineering services
03 / Product integrationPlanned product

CoreVQ SDK

Plan future native embedding under a qualified API, deployment contract, and separate SDK agreement.

Review planned integration
CoreVQ provides measurements and evidence.

Encoder control, optimization policy, orchestration, and final operating decisions are part of the customer solution or a Services engagement. The SDK is planned and is not included in Suite 1.0.